пятница, 18 февраля 2011 г.

Is marriage a lifelong burden or endless happiness?
This question is very difficult. That's why we must think a lot before make a desigion to mary or not. From one point marrige bringes us lot's of advanteges. When the person is married he or she has more stable life. They recieve the each day duties. And in general what can be better than living together with person you love. 
But the medal has the other side. First of all not all of us ususally understend is it a truly love or just an amorousness. And this might have huge consequences. The first romenthic entrainment will pass and what will rest, nothing. Many of the daily responsibilities will become boring, nothing would bring joy and this will either destroy the marriage or it will transeforme it into the hell the lifelong torture. The last point is that we must have good finansual statues to get married either living without money will lead to the same consequences I mean no endless happiness but a lifelong burden.
So what shell we do than to make the marrige lifelong and happy. Of coarse my opinion does not pretend to be the only right, but I think that before get married we must think over and deside some questions. The first is either we are moraly ready to make such a step. Than we must deside is this the truly person we are ready to live with and to share everything. So and the last but not the least do we have finansual capability to leave alone without any support and you deside that you are ready so good luck.
     

1 комментарий:

  1. Generally speaking, Alexandr’s essay is not bad.
    From the one hand, it’s logically structured, so we can find there three main components: introduction, body and conclusion. His position is presented briefly, but clearly and well-reasoned.
    But from the other hand, it turned out, that the Author is an inattentive person, because there are some grammatical “misprints”: not ‘desigion’ – but ‘decision’, not ‘marrige’ – but ‘marriage’, not ‘deside’ - but ‘decide’ , not ‘finansual’ – but ‘financial’, not ‘bringes’ – but ‘brings’ (3p, sg.), not ‘romenthic’ but ‘romantic’ and others.

    ОтветитьУдалить